Thread:3cooldog92/@comment-26014718-20131111231404/@comment-7167230-20131112132535

DoubleCross♥ wrote: @Ariana Grande Forever I do apreciate your comment, because it's always good to get a second opinion in a situation like this. Anways, I did warn her to stop arguing with cooldog or she would be banned for a long period of time, this warning was for that comment cooldog wrote below. Also, this whole sockpuppeting has nothing to do with this wiki, yet it keeps getting brought up over and over again. Cooldog has experienced it on the S&C wiki, and is bringing it over to this wiki. Can you imagine how frustrating that is?

''How about you both see it from my point of view. ''

A user asked you about what had happened to cause the following forum I had created, you explained what had happened and for some reason brought up sock puppeting. Dechel was active at the time and stepped in, quote:

Dechel-Auslly-Flyna wrote: We don't want to mention names because it will start the whole thing up again. It's best not to mention it

Which I had agreed to and asked for names not to be mentioned.

However, you ignored this and involved a users name which you knew Dechel would retailate to.

I then warned you to drop the subject, however once again you ignored me. Sound familiar?

DoubleCross♥ wrote: Cooldog please don't bring this up again, no fingers need to be pointed. Especially since punishment is long over. It's been nearly 4 weeks since the issue, there is no reason for it to be repeated.

3cooldog92 wrote: ^You are Mamuel. I still don't get why you're trying to continue this charade after you've been blocked on 3 wikis (including this one) for sock puppeting with that account.   And while I'm going through the comments can I just point out that she wasn't banned for sockpuppeting because that was not an issue, her ignorance towards the rules was the problem.

Afterwards the two of you continued to argue over the subject of sockpuppeting until I stepped in.

3cooldog92 wrote: Fine. That means she has to shut her trap though.

Can you honestly tell me that was an appropriate response? That comment above is the reason for this warning. I warned both you to stop arguing on the forum, I don't see the point in me repeating that over and over again, especially if neither of you listen. You pointed out that continuous warnings does nothing when it's ignored.

Which leads us to where we are now.

The only way for this whole thing to stop is if you both just leave each other alone, you're both not just going to ignore each other when the you're both blantly complaining about each other.

If you want me to ban her, then I'll have to ban you too. It's only fair. I don't play favourites here. You've broken the rules so many times on this wiki for disrespectfulness towards other users, constant harrassment towards Dechel about sockpuppeting, ignorance of Admins warnings, and continuous arguments with other users.

While you keep on saying that she is breaking the rules, and expressing your comments on twitter towards Eric and I asking why we haven't banned her yet because she is only cause more drama etc.., how about you read your own comments and tell me this: is that really acceptable? Is is nessecary? Is it going to make her stop? Do you honestly expect her not to defend herself? You're older than her, you should be setting an example, calling users out with spiteful comments is not the appropriate way to handle anything.You're having an argument with a user who is like 6 years younger than you, what does that tell you?

You make her out to be some kind of mastermind or something; when she's just a kid trying to have fun on the internet (not talking about this "sockpuppeting business") with her friends who have the same interests. Isn't that what we're all doing?

I see DoubleCross's point here. DAF really did nothing wrong. The matter of "sockpuppetry" was brought up again, and it isn't really tolerated on this wiki. I also see your point 3cooldog, but your effectiveness and attitude towards her was not appreciated. Sure, she came into the convo, but really, she didn't do anything wrong. She just informed the user that she didn't being it up again, and I agree, but 3cooldog, you shouldn't have mentioned it again. The matter has been resolved and we don't want to bring more conflict to this wiki.